The Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for protein is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day. For a 70 kg (154 lb) adult, that is 56 grams — roughly two chicken breasts. This number is one of the most misunderstood figures in nutrition, because it was never intended to be an optimal intake recommendation. The RDA represents the minimum intake needed to prevent negative nitrogen balance — essentially, the amount required to stop you from wasting muscle mass in a sedentary state. It was established using short-term nitrogen balance studies in young, healthy, inactive adults, and it does not account for exercise, aging, recovery from illness, or any goal beyond basic nitrogen equilibrium.
How Much Protein Do Active Adults Actually Need?
Dr. Stuart Phillips, professor of kinesiology at McMaster University and one of the most-cited protein researchers in exercise science, has spent two decades arguing that the RDA is outdated for anyone who exercises regularly. His 2018 British Journal of Sports Medicine meta-analysis (49 studies, n=1,863) established 1.6 g/kg/day as the threshold for maximal muscle protein synthesis response to resistance training, with diminishing returns above 2.2 g/kg/day. For a 70 kg adult, that translates to 112–154 grams daily — two to three times the RDA.
The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN), in its 2017 position stand (led by Dr. Jose Antonio at Nova Southeastern University), recommends 1.4–2.0 g/kg/day for physically active individuals and notes that intakes up to 2.2 g/kg/day may be beneficial during caloric restriction to preserve lean mass. The American College of Sports Medicine recommends 1.2–2.0 g/kg/day for athletes. Every sports nutrition governing body recommends significantly more protein than the RDA for anyone who exercises — the consensus is broad and well-supported.
For endurance athletes (runners, cyclists, swimmers), the evidence supports 1.2–1.6 g/kg/day. For strength and power athletes, 1.6–2.2 g/kg/day. For recreational exercisers who strength-train 2–4 times per week, 1.6 g/kg/day is a reasonable target. During a caloric deficit (dieting), protein needs increase further because the body is more likely to catabolize muscle for energy — Dr. Phillips's research shows that increasing protein to 2.3–3.1 g/kg of lean body mass during a deficit preserves significantly more muscle than lower intakes.
Protein and Aging: Anabolic Resistance
Anabolic resistance is one of the most important and least discussed nutritional challenges of aging. Beginning around age 50, skeletal muscle becomes progressively less responsive to the anabolic signal from dietary amino acids. A meal containing 20 grams of protein that maximally stimulates muscle protein synthesis (MPS) in a 25-year-old may produce only 50–60% of that response in a 70-year-old. The muscle is not broken — it can still build and repair — but it requires a larger stimulus to achieve the same response.
Dr. van Loon's research has shown that the leucine threshold (the amount of the amino acid leucine needed to trigger MPS) increases with age: from approximately 2.0 g in young adults to 2.5–3.0 g in older adults. This means older adults need more protein per meal, not just more protein per day, to maintain muscle mass. The PROT-AGE group recommends 1.0–1.2 g/kg/day for healthy older adults and 1.2–1.5 g/kg/day for those with acute or chronic illness, injury, or significant physical activity.
The consequences of inadequate protein intake in aging are severe. Sarcopenia — the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength — affects approximately 10–16% of adults over 60 and up to 50% of those over 80 (2019 Age and Ageing meta-analysis, k=35). Sarcopenia increases fall risk, reduces functional independence, delays recovery from illness and surgery, and is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality. Adequate protein intake, combined with resistance training, is the most effective intervention for preventing and reversing sarcopenia.
Distribution Matters: The Leucine Threshold
Total daily protein intake is important, but how that protein is distributed across meals matters nearly as much. Dr. Donald Layman, professor emeritus of nutrition at the University of Illinois, developed the leucine threshold hypothesis: each meal should contain approximately 2.5–3.0 grams of leucine (roughly 25–40 grams of high-quality protein) to maximally stimulate muscle protein synthesis via the mTOR pathway. Below this threshold, the anabolic signal is weak; above it, returns diminish rapidly.
The typical American eating pattern — a protein-light breakfast (toast and juice: ~8 g protein), a moderate lunch (sandwich: ~15 g), and a protein-heavy dinner (steak: ~60 g) — concentrates most protein in one meal. Layman's 2015 Journal of Nutrition study (n=40) demonstrated that evenly distributing protein across three meals (30/30/30) produced 25% greater daily muscle protein synthesis than the skewed pattern (10/15/60) — even though total daily intake was identical. Two of the three meals in the typical pattern fall below the leucine threshold and produce minimal anabolic stimulus.
Practical translation: aim for 25–40 grams of protein at each of your three main meals. Breakfast is typically the weakest link — adding eggs, Greek yogurt, or protein-fortified oatmeal can bring a typical 8–10 g breakfast up to the 25 g threshold. The single biggest improvement most people can make to their protein strategy is not eating more total protein but redistributing what they already eat.
Plant vs. Animal Protein: What the Evidence Shows
Plant protein can meet all requirements for muscle maintenance and growth, but it requires more deliberate planning than animal protein. Dr. Kevin Tipton, professor of sport, health and exercise science at the University of Stirling, has documented two systematic differences. First, plant proteins are generally 10–20% less digestible than animal proteins as measured by the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) — the FAO's updated protein quality metric. Soy and pea protein score well (DIAAS 0.90–0.95); wheat protein scores poorly (DIAAS 0.45). Second, most plant proteins are lower in leucine (the amino acid that triggers MPS) than animal proteins — meaning a larger serving is needed to cross the leucine threshold.
A 2021 Sports Medicine systematic review (k=16 studies, n=604) by Dr. Heidi Lynch at Point Loma Nazarene University concluded that plant-based athletes may need 10–20% more total protein (roughly 1.8–2.4 g/kg/day for strength athletes) to achieve equivalent anabolic responses to animal-protein-consuming counterparts. Combining complementary plant proteins — legumes (high in lysine, low in methionine) with grains (high in methionine, low in lysine) — within the same day addresses amino acid profile gaps, though they do not need to be consumed in the same meal as was previously believed.
The protein source debate often becomes ideological. The evidence does not support either extreme — animal protein is not necessary for optimal muscle health, and plant protein is not equivalent gram-for-gram. Both can work; plant-based approaches require higher total intake and more attention to leucine content and amino acid complementarity.
The Upper Limit: Is Too Much Protein Dangerous?
The persistent belief that high protein intake damages healthy kidneys is not supported by the evidence. A 2018 British Journal of Sports Medicine meta-analysis (k=28, n=1,474) by Dr. Robert Morton at McMaster University found no adverse effects on kidney function (measured by GFR, BUN, and creatinine) in healthy adults consuming up to 3.0 g/kg/day for up to one year. A 2016 Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism study by Dr. Jose Antonio (n=14, 1 year at 2.5–3.3 g/kg/day) found no changes in kidney function, liver enzymes, or blood lipids.
The kidney concern originated from observations that high-protein diets increase renal workload (glomerular filtration rate rises to excrete urea). In healthy kidneys, this is a normal adaptive response — similar to how cardiac output increases during exercise without damaging the heart. In individuals with existing chronic kidney disease, however, high protein intake can accelerate disease progression. The distinction is critical: high protein is safe for healthy kidneys and potentially harmful for diseased ones. Anyone with known kidney disease, reduced GFR, or proteinuria should follow their nephrologist's protein recommendations, which may be lower than the general-population guidelines.
Practical Recommendations
For sedentary adults with no health conditions: 0.8–1.0 g/kg/day remains adequate, though modest increases to 1.2 g/kg/day may support body composition and satiety. For physically active adults: 1.6–2.2 g/kg/day, distributed across 3–4 meals of 25–40 g each. For adults over 65: 1.0–1.2 g/kg/day minimum, with 25–30 g per meal to overcome anabolic resistance. For anyone in a caloric deficit: increase protein toward the upper end of the range to preserve lean mass. Prioritize whole-food protein sources (meat, fish, eggs, dairy, legumes, tofu) over supplements; use supplements to fill gaps, not as primary sources. Track for a week if you are uncertain — most people who have not measured their intake are surprised by how much less protein they consume than they assumed.